Elucidation of a cryptic interstitial 7q31.3 deletion in a patient with a language disorder and mild mental retardation by array‐CGH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report on a 14-year-old boy who presented with bilateral cleft lip and palate, hearing loss, a language processing disorder, and mild mental retardation (MR). G-banded chromosome analysis of the patient and his family revealed he carried an apparently balanced de novo complex translocation involving chromosomes 5, 6, and 7. Chromosomal comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was performed to investigate the possibility of any genomic imbalance as a result of the complex rearrangement. No abnormality was detected at any of the translocation breakpoint regions (5p13.2, 6p24, 7q21.1, and 7q21.3), nor was there any other imbalance which fell inside our significance level of 0.8-1.2. Array-CGH analysis was initiated to perform a higher resolution search for gains and losses, and revealed a deletion of two adjacent clones, CTB-133K23 and RP11-112P4, mapping to 7q31.3, which are 4.4 Mb apart. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using these two clones confirmed the deletion. 7q31 has frequently been implicated in the search for genes involved in speech and language disorders. The specific 7q31.3 region deleted in our patient has significant overlap with some such areas of the genome. These findings are, therefore, of value in identifying genes involved in the speech and language phenotypes. This study has shown the importance of array-CGH in investigating patients who have clinical features suggestive of a chromosome abnormality, but with apparently balanced chromosome rearrangements. It has demonstrated that the array-CGH technique provides a much greater insight into submicroscopic chromosome imbalances than conventional cytogenetic techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".