A PROPOSAL FOR A NEW RED ALGAL ORDER, THE THOREALES<sup>1</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Representatives of the freshwater red algal family Thoreaceae were studied to resolve their taxonomic and phylogenetic status. Three specimens of Nemalionopsis and five collections of Thorea were examined for pit plug ultrastructure and analyzed for the sequences of the genes coding for the large subunit of RUBISCO (rbcL) and the small subunit of rRNA (18S rRNA). The phylogenetic trees generated from the two genes, and a combined tree all showed the Thoreaceae to be contained in a well‐supported monophyletic clade that is separate from the other two families currently classified in the Batrachospermales, the Batrachospermaceae and the Lemaneaceae. In addition, secondary structure elements of the 18S rRNA gene were observed at positions 650 and 1145 (Escherichia coli numbering system) that are not present in other members of the Rhodophyta. The pit plugs of the gametophytic and chantransia stages of the Thoreaceae contain two cap layers, the outer one of which is typically plate‐like, though occasionally inflated ones have been seen. No pit plug cap membrane has been observed. These findings indicate the Thoreaceae has been misclassified in the Batrachospermales and should be placed in its own order, the Thoreales. This order is characterized by having freshwater representatives with multiaxial gametophytes, a uniaxial chantransia stage, and pit plugs with two cap layers, the outer one of which is usually plate‐like.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".