MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082521255 · doi:10.1117/12.803564

Femtosecond pulse generation in a C-band quantum dot laser

2008· article· en· W2082521255 on OpenAlexaff
Zhenguo Lü, Jiaren Liu, S. Raymond, Philip J. Poole, Pedro Barrios, Daniel Poitras

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaser linewidthOptoelectronicsLasing thresholdMaterials scienceQuantum dot laserLaserOpticsQuantum dotInjection seederFemtosecondSemiconductor laser theoryWavelengthPhysicsSemiconductor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have demonstrated femtosecond pulses from a passive single-section monolithic InAs/InP quantum-dot (QD) semiconductor laser with the active length of 456 µm and the ridge width of 2.5 µm in the C-band wavelength range from 1528 nm to 1565 nm. The transform-limited Gaussian-pulses are generated at the 92-GHz repetition rate with the 312-fs pulse duration without any pulse compression scheme. The average output power is larger than 13.2 mW for the injection current of 60 mA. And the lasing threshold current and external differential quantum efficiency are 17.2 mA and 38%, respectively. The mode-beating linewidth of the proposed QD mode-locked laser (MLL) was measured less than 20 KHz. We have interpreted that four-wave-mixing (FWM) process and other nonlinear effects within the QD waveguide gain materials make the major contributions to lock the phase the longitudinal modes of the QD Fabry-Perot cavity together to achieve this strong self-pulsation process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207