Shrinkage of Full-Scale Girders Cast with Self-Consolidating Concrete
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shrinkage can be critical factor for the design of structural members due to the length changes by the time-dependent deformation. In this investigation, two self-consolidating concrete (SCC) and two high-performance concrete (HPC) mixtures with target 56-day compressive strengths of 55 and 69 MPa and having 18-hour release strengths of 34.5 MPa and 43 MPa, respectively, were used to cast four full-scale AASHTO-Type II girders measuring 9.44-m in length. For each strength level, the SCC and HPC mixtures were proportioned with the same water-to-cementitious materials ratio (w/cm) and binder type. The high-range water-reducing admixture (HRWRA) dosage was adjusted to obtain a slump flow of 680 ± 20 mm for the SCC mixtures and a slump of 160 ± 20 mm for the HPC mixtures. The constructability and shrinkage of full-scale girders cast with SCC and HPC mixtures used in precast prestressed girders were investigated and compared. Results of tests on full-scale girders indicated that, SCC placement was successfully carried out by casting the concrete from location at the midspan of the 9.44-m long girders. Both HPC and SCC mixtures developed similar autogenous shrinkage for the mixtures made with the similar w/cm; the two SCC mixtures developed about 20% greater drying shrinkage than the comparable HPC mixtures after 112 days of drying.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".