MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082574517 · doi:10.2514/6.2013-1063

Composite Lay-up Optimization\\for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blades

2013· article· en· W2082574517 on OpenAlex
Michael McWilliam, Curran Crawford

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbine bladeCoupling (piping)Span (engineering)Blade (archaeology)Scheme (mathematics)Structural engineeringComputer scienceBendingComposite numberEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionTurbineMechanical engineeringEngineeringAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research has shown that design concepts based on advanced lay-ups can improve wind turbine blades. Adding carbon fiber reinforcement at outboard sections can make blades lighter reducing edge-wise bending loads. Adding biased fibers can introduce bend-twist coupling reducing the fatigue damage. Optimizations is a powerful tool that can be used to solve the best configuration. To successfully explore these concepts through optimization this paper introduces a parameterization scheme that reflects the layered nature of these designs. The scheme incorporates span-wise variation of material to accurately model the affect of span-wise transition. This parameterization scheme will be compared with other schemes typically seen in literature. Application of this scheme will be demonstrated by developing an optimal glass/carbon blade and an optimal blade with bend-twist coupling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it