Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article critically reviews important developments in the anthropology of urban China. Although its primary focus is on works by China anthropologists, it addresses the interdisciplinary challenge and the increasingly ambiguous boundary between the “rural” and the “urban”. More specifically, the article analyzes major theoretical and pragmatic issues addressed by anthropologists in the following seven thematic areas: minority urbanization; urban economies and the influence of global capital; health; kinship and gender; migration; urban space and community; consumption and popular culture. Each section seeks to juxtapose competing arguments made by scholars and analyzes the larger implications of their findings. It further suggests three research directions that the anthropology of urban China could take in the future—a greater interdisciplinary approach to incorporate insights from other related fields, a larger comparative perspective that situates postreform urban China in relation to other formerly socialist countries and other developing cities in Latin America and Africa, and finally greater capabilities for integrating different levels of analysis by rescaling the levels at which social activities and institutions operate today.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it