Nsa2 Is an Unstable, Conserved Factor Required for the Maturation of 27 SB Pre-rRNAs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a large variety of pre-ribosomal factors have been identified recently, a number of which are still of unknown function. The essential pre-ribosomal 30-kDa protein, Nsa2, was characterized as one of the most conserved proteins from yeast to human. We show here that the expression of the human orthologue TINP1 complements the repression of NSA2 in yeast. Nsa2 was co-purified in several pre-ribosomal complexes and found to be essential for the large ribosomal subunit biogenesis. Like several other factors of the pre-60 S particles, the absence of Nsa2 correlated with a decrease in the 25 S and 5.8 S ribosomal RNA levels, and with an accumulation of 27 SB pre-ribosomal RNA intermediates. We show that Nsa2 is a functional partner of the putative GTPase Nog1. In the absence of Nsa2, Nog1 was still able to associate with pre-ribosomal complexes blocked in maturation. In contrast, in the absence of Nog1, Nsa2 disappeared from pre-60 S complexes. Indeed, when ribosome biogenesis was blocked upstream of Nsa2, this short half-lived protein was largely depleted, suggesting that its cellular levels are tightly regulated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".