Effect of acute and chronic hypoxia on the swimming performance, metabolic capacity and cardiac function of Atlantic cod (<i>Gadus morhua</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low water oxygen content (hypoxia) is a common feature of many freshwater and marine environments. However, we have a poor understanding of the degree to which diminished cardiac function contributes to the reduction in fish swimming performance concomitant with acute exposure to hypoxia, or how fish cardiorespiratory physiology is altered by, or adapts to, chronic hypoxia. Thus, we acclimated adult Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) to either approximately 8-9 kPa O(2) (40-45% air saturation) or approximately 21 kPa O(2) (100% air saturation; normoxia) for 6-12 weeks at 10 degrees C, and subsequently measured metabolic variables [routine oxygen consumption (M(O(2)), maximum (M(O(2)), metabolic scope] and cardiac function (cardiac output, Q; heart rate, f(H); and stroke volume, V(S)) in these fish during critical swimming speed (U(crit)) tests performed at both levels of water oxygenation. Although surgery (flow probe implantation) reduced the U(crit) of normoxia-acclimated cod by 14% (from 1.74 to 1.50 BL s(-1)) under normoxic conditions, exposure to acute hypoxia lowered the U(crit) of both groups (surgery and non-surgery) by approximately 30% (to 1.23 and 1.02 BL s(-1), respectively). This reduction in swimming performance was associated with large decreases in maximum M(O(2)) and metabolic scope (> or = 50%), and maximum f(H) and Q (by 16 and 22%), but not V(S). Long-term acclimation to hypoxia resulted in a significant elevation in normoxic metabolic rate as compared with normoxia-acclimated fish (by 27%), but did not influence normoxic or hypoxic values for U(crit), maximum M(O(2)) or metabolic scope. This was surprising given that resting and maximum values for Q were significantly lower in hypoxia-acclimated cod at both levels of oxygenation, because of lower values for V(S). However, hypoxia-acclimated cod were able to consume more oxygen for a given cardiac output. These results provide important insights into how fish cardiorespiratory physiology is impacted by short-term and prolonged exposure to hypoxia, and further highlight the tremendous capacity of the fish cardiorespiratory system to deal with environmental challenges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".