Phase I study of tandem high‐dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell rescue for children with recurrent brain tumors: A pediatric blood and marrow transplant consortium study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue (HDC/SCR) has produced responses and prolonged survival for some children with recurrent brain tumors, but is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. A Phase I trial of two cycles of HDC/SCR for recurrent brain tumors in children was performed to determine the maximum tolerated doses for a novel regimen. PROCEDURES: Two cycles of HDC/SCR were given. Cycle 1 included thiotepa and carmustine given on days -5, -4, and -3. Four to six weeks later, patients received cycle 2 which included thiotepa and carboplatin given on days -5, -4, and -3. Autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were infused on day 0 of each cycle. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were treated and 25 patients received both cycles of HDC/SCR. Common toxicities included mucositis, emesis, diarrhea, anorexia, and pancytopenia. Eight of 32 (25%) assessable children died from regimen-related toxicity. Pulmonary failure occurred in seven patients. Seven patients had grade 3-4 neurotoxicity. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) was 25%. CONCLUSIONS: We determined the maximum tolerated regimen to be thiotepa 600 mg/m(2) and carmustine 300 mg/m(2) followed by thiotepa 600 mg/m(2) and carboplatin 1,200 mg/m(2) . Pulmonary toxicity was considerable. The toxic death rate was similar to other trials of HDC/SCR for children with recurrent brain tumors performed during the same time period. The regimen resulted in prolonged time to progression for a significant number of patients and long-term survival for some patients with recurrent medulloblastoma and rhabdoid tumor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".