End-Grafted Low-Molecular-Weight PNIPAM Does Not Collapse above the LCST
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interfacial properties of end-grafted temperature-responsive poly(N-isopropylacryamide) (PNIPAM) were quantified by direct force measurements both above and below the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of 32 degrees C. The forces were measured between identical, opposing PNIPAM films and between a PNIPAM film and a lipid membrane. At the grafting densities and molecular weights investigated, the polymer extension did not change significantly above the LCST, and the polymers did not adhere. Below the LCST, the force-distance profiles suggest a vertical phase separation, which results in a diluter outer layer and a dense surface proximal layer. At large separations, the force profiles agree qualitatively with simple polymer theory but deviate at small separations. Importantly, at these low grafting densities and molecular weights, the end-grafted PNIPAM does not collapse above the LCST. This finding has direct implications for triggering liposomal drug release with end-grafted PNIPAM, but it increases the temperature range where these short PNIPAM chains function as steric stabilizers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".