MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082749717 · doi:10.1080/02770900802444211

Alveolar Macrophage Subpopulations in Bronchoalveolar Lavage and Induced Sputum of Asthmatic and Control Subjects

2009· article· en· W2082749717 on OpenAlexafffund
Julie St‐Laurent, Véronique Turmel, Louis‐Philippe Boulet, Élyse Y. Bissonnette

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Asthma · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineBronchoalveolar lavageSputumAsthmaAlveolar macrophageImmunologyMacrophageTherapeutic irrigationPulmonary alveolusRespiratory diseasePathologyLungInternal medicineSurgeryTuberculosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Alveolar macrophages (AM) are the most numerous immune cells in the airways and are involved in the immunological homeostasis of the lung. Intriguingly, their role in asthma remains unclear probably, in part, because of their heterogeneity. OBJECTIVE: To characterize AM population from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and induced sputum (IS) of asthmatic and normal subjects using specific biomarkers. METHODS: Non-asthmatic non-allergic and allergic mild asthmatic subjects were recruited for this study. AM were obtained from BAL and IS and cytospins were prepared. Immunocytochemistry was performed for nine cellular markers (CD68, RFD7, CD14, CD11b, CD83, CD64, CD80, CD86, and FIZZ1). RESULTS: Asthmatic subjects had more AM RFD7(+) in BAL compared with IS, whereas control subjects had more AM RFD7(+) in IS than in BAL. Consequently, there was an increased number of AM RFD7(+) in BAL of asthmatic subjects compared with BAL of control subjects. AM CD11b(+) was higher in BAL than in IS in both groups. The expression of FIZZ1, marker of macrophage alternative activation, was similar in asthmatic and normal subjects. CONCLUSION: The expression of cellular markers on AM differs according to their localization in the lung. Subpopulations of AM may contribute to the inflammatory profile observed in asthmatic subjects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of AsthmaSame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207