The life, death, and ROMP activity of ruthenium complexes containing the basic, chelating diphosphine bis(dicyclohexyl)-1,4-phosphinobutane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reaction of RuCl2(PPh3)3 with bis(dicyclohexyl)-1,4-phosphinobutane (dcypb) under N2 affords access to a formerly elusive family of dcypb complexes based on the RuCl2(PP) core. Under Ar or vacuum atmosphere, decomposition occurs via Ru-promoted dehydrogenation of the dcypb ligand. While the N2-stabilized species [RuCl2(dcypb)]2(N2) (4a) is easily handled under N2 in nonchlorinated solvents, reaction with chlorinated solvents rapidly yields paramagnetic Ru2Cl5(dcypb)2 (5). The N2 ligand within 4a is readily displaced under H2 or CO atmosphere, yielding Ru2Cl4(dcypb)2(H2) (6) or RuCl2(dcypb)(CO)2, the latter as a mixture of ccc-(7) and tcc-(8) isomers. Benzylidene derivative RuCl2(dcypb)(CHPh) (1a), prepared in situ by reaction of 4a with PhCHN2, proves exceptionally active in ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of norbornene. The X-ray crystal structure of 5 is reported: triclinic, a = 13.390(2), b = 15.726(2), c = 19.524(2) Å, α = 77.325(2), β = 70.964(2), γ = 73.478(2)°, with space group P[Formula: see text] and Z = 2.Key words: ruthenium, alkylphosphine, dehydrogenation, carbene, metathesis, crystal structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".