Individuals taking combination therapies for HIV or AIDS faced barriers to remaining in, or returning to work
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maticka-Tyndale E, Adam BD, Cohen JJ. To work or not to work: combination therapies and HIV. Qual Health Res2002 ; 12 : 1353 –72 [OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] QUESTION: What are the labour force experiences of people living with HIV or AIDS who are taking combination therapies? Qualitative description. Windsor and Essex County region of Ontario, Canada. 35 people ≥18 years of age (89% men) who had tested positive for HIV, were taking combination therapies, and lived in or received AIDS services in Essex County were identified by the local HIV Care Program and AIDS Service Organization. Two thirds of participants were 30–39 years of age. Participants had been aware of their HIV positive status for <2 to >5 years. Individual, semistructured, indepth interviews were done between 1999 and 2000. Open ended questions addressed areas including treatment patterns, taking medications, symptom management strategies, work activities, relationships, life changes, and future plans. Interviews generally lasted 1–1.5 hours. Data analysis involved identifying clusters … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DQualitative%2BHealth%2BResearch%26rft.stitle%253DQual%2BHealth%2BRes%26rft.aulast%253DMaticka-Tyndale%26rft.auinit1%253DE.%26rft.volume%253D12%26rft.issue%253D10%26rft.spage%253D1353%26rft.epage%253D1372%26rft.atitle%253DTo%2BWork%2Bor%2BNot%2Bto%2BWork%253A%2BCombination%2BTherapies%2Band%2BHIV%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1177%252F1049732302238748%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F12474908%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/1049732302238748&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=12474908&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febnurs%2F6%2F4%2F124.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000179328400005&link_type=ISI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".