The Effect of Immunization with Killed Tumor Cells, with/Without Feeding of <i>Echinacea purpurea</i> in an Erythroleukemic Mouse Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Tumor amelioration via vaccination/immunization is a practice for which considerable experimental and clinical support is growing. Combination therapies have proven to be more beneficial than treatment with single agents. We hypothesized that immunization of mice with killed erythroleukemia cells prior to the induction of erythroleukemia via injection of viable tumor cells, plus dietary administration of a known immuno-enhancing phytocompound, Echinacea purpurea, would be more effective than immunization alone. DESIGN: A commercially available extract of E. purpurea root, already proven as a natural killer (NK) cell stimulant, was administered via the chow, for periods of 9 days or 3 months after the onset of leukemia to mice which had been injected (immunized) 5 weeks earlier with killed leukemia cells. RESULTS: Immunized mice (+/- E. purpurea) had significantly prolonged life spans versus non-immunized mice, with an even greater proportion of hosts surviving long-term in the E. purpurea-fed group. NK cells, the mediators of nonspecific immunity and well-demonstrated mediators of tumor cytolysis, were very significantly elevated in immunized, leukemic mice receiving E. purpurea in their diet versus those receiving untreated chow. Early in tumor development (9 days), cells mediating specific immunity (T, B lymphocytes) were 10-12 times higher in absolute numbers in the spleens in all immunized, leukemic mice vs unimmunized, leukemic mice at the same stage of tumor progression. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that combination therapy, involving specific tumor cell immunization, followed by daily phytotherapy (dietary E. purpurea), sensitized the immune cells and led to life span prolongation greater than that provided by immunization alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".