PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF RECONSTITUTED CARROT/ALGINATE PARTICLES STABLE FOR ASEPTIC PROCESSING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Textural and thermophysical properties of reconstituted carrot/alginate particles, subjected to thermal and mechanical stresses during aseptic processing, were investigated. Four levels of sodium alginate (4, 6, 8 and 10%) and calcium chloride (0.2, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5%) and three levels of water addition (50, 150 and 300 mL) were used for two types of alginate (high in guluronic acid, HGA and low in guluronic acid, LGA). Hardness, water content, density and thermal conductivity of reconstituted carrot/alginate particles were determined using an Instron, an oven drying technique, a pycnometer measurement and a line heat source method, respectively. Moreover, Bacillus subtilis was inoculated in carrot/alginate particles. Reconstituted particles, unlike carrot cubes and other vegetables, were thermally stable. The moisture content increased with a decrease in calcium chloride concentration and an increase in water addition. There was no significant effect of formulation on density and thermal conductivity measurements. Reconstituted carrot/alginate cubes were able to sustain successfully thermal and mechanical stresses encountered in a pilot scale aseptic processing system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".