Direct and indirect effects of UV radiation on benthic communities: epilithic food quality and invertebrate growth in four montane lakes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The direct harmful effects of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) on benthic and planktonic organisms have been well studied in aquatic systems. Less clear, however, is how UVR might affect aquatic communities through its effects on trophic interactions. The focus of this study was twofold: first, to examine the direct effect of UVR on benthic invertebrates and epilithon, the rock‐dwelling matrix of algae, bacteria, viruses, fungi and detritus, and second, to examine the indirect effect of UVR‐mediated shifts in epilithic food quality on epilithic consumers. Food quality was assessed by measuring carbon to nutrient ratios and the concentration of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in the epilithic matrix; the effect of its change on epilithic consumers was measured using a feeding experiment. The study was conducted in four montane lakes, where downwelling UVR can be intense. Of these lakes, the benthic community of only one was strongly affected by UVR. In this lake, exposure to UVR decreased epilithic accrual and invertebrate colonization, and, contrary to our expectations, increased food quality in the shallows through decreased carbon to phosphorus ratios and increased PUFA concentrations. In another of the four study lakes, the feeding experiment showed no significant difference in growth rates between invertebrates fed UVR‐exposed and UVR‐shielded epilithon, or invertebrates directly exposed to or shielded from UVR. This study demonstrates that although UVR can play an important role in structuring the trophic dynamics of benthic communities, its effects will not be constant across systems, or important in all environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".