Synthesis and characterization of novel polysiloxane-grafted fluoropolymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fluorosilicone polymers combine the properties of both fluorocarbons and siloxanes, yielding materials with unique properties. Novel crosslinked fluorosilicone polymers were synthesized by grafting diisocyanate-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) to hydroxyl-functionalized fluoropolymers of poly(tetrafluoroethylene-co-vinyl acetate-co-vinyl alcohol) (PTFE-VAc-VA), as confirmed by elemental bulk and surface analysis. The fluorosilicone polymers containing 34 mol% of TFE were thermally stable with a degradation temperature of 267 °C. Fluorosilicone films were found to be more hydrophobic than the parent, non-grafted fluoropolymers; dynamic advancing and receding water contact angles for PTFE-co-VAc-co-VA-g-PDMS were 104° ± 1° and 61° ± 1°, respectively, whereas for PTFE-co-VAc they were 90° ± 2° and 59° ± 2°. The combined properties of thermal stability and hydrophobicity suggest that these fluorosilicones may be useful for coating and paint applications.Key words: fluoropolymers, fluorosilicone, polydimethylsiloxane, supercritical carbon dioxide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".