The Effect of Plant Height on Tan Spot on Durum Wheat in Southern Saskatchewan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tan spot [caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Died.) Drechs.] is the most important leaf disease of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum). Most of the durum cultivars in western Canada are of conventional height but development of shorter cultivars is desirable. Changes in microenvironment resulting from a height reduction might cause greater leaf spot development. The effect of plant height on tan spot of durum wheat was determined in five pairs of genotypes near-isogenic for plant height and five randomly selected populations, each with a semidwarf and a conventional height parent. These were grown in five environments in Saskatchewan (1996-1998 at Swift Current, 1997-1998 at Indian Head), and evaluated for tan spot reaction in a growth chamber. There was no difference in tan spot reaction under controlled conditions between short and tall genotype(s) in each pair or population, although there were differences within each height category. Under field conditions, short genotypes had either equal or greater disease than tall genotypes. Contrasts between all short and tall genotypes also showed that the tall had less disease in 1998 at Indian Head (9.8 for tall, 10.2 for short) and in all years at Swift Current (9.5 and 9.9 in 1996, 8.1 and 8.7 in 1997, 8.5 and 8.9 in 1998, for tall and short, respectively). However, there was genetic variability within populations, with some short having equal or less disease than tall genotypes. Some of these short genotypes also had a low tan spot lesion type under controlled conditions. We conclude that plant height could affect tan spot development in durum wheat under conditions prevalent in southern Saskatchewan, and that this is probably mediated by canopy density.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".