Interaction of viscous and inviscid instability modes in separation–bubble transition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes numerical simulations that are used to examine the interaction of viscous and inviscid instability modes in laminar-to-turbulent transition in a separation bubble. The results of a direct numerical simulation are presented in which separation of a laminar boundary-layer occurs in the presence of an adverse streamwise pressure gradient. The simulation is performed at low freestream-turbulence levels and at a flow Reynolds number and pressure distribution approximating those typically encountered on the suction side of low-pressure turbine blades in a gas-turbine engine. The simulation results reveal the development of a viscous instability upstream of the point of separation which produces streamwise-oriented vortices in the attached laminar boundary layer. These vortices remain embedded in the flow downstream of separation and are carried into the separated shear layer, where they are amplified by the local adverse pressure-gradient and contribute to the formation of coherent hairpin-like vortices. A strong interaction is observed between these vortices and the inviscid instability that typically dominates the shear layer in the separated zone. The interaction is noted to determine the spanwise extent of the vortical flow structures that periodically shed from the downstream end of the separated shear layer. The structure of the shed vortical flow structures is examined and compared with the coherent structures typically observed within turbulent boundary layers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it