MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083241473 · doi:10.1002/biof.77

Phosphatidylcholine‐specific phospholipase C activity and level increase evidently in thromboangitis obliterans

2010· article· en· W2083241473 on OpenAlexaff
Mao‐hua Wang, Xing Jin, Xuejun Wu, Jing‐yong Zhang, Jun‐Ying Miao

Bibliographic record

VenueBioFactors · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathogenesisImmunofluorescencePhospholipase CDownregulation and upregulationPhosphatidylcholineMedicinePhospholipaseInternal medicineImmunologyChemistryBiochemistryReceptorEnzymeAntibodyPhospholipidMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thromboangitis obliterans (TAO) is considered to be an inflammatory disease. Previous research has demonstrated that phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C (PC-PLC) plays critical roles in various inflammatory responses. However, the connection between PC-PLC and TAO is undetermined. Therefore, we sought to investigate whether PC-PLC was implicated in TAO. In our study, there were two groups: TAO group and control group. The PC-PLC activity of serum of two groups (16 TAO patients and 11 controls) was detected by PC-PLC activity assay. The level and distribution of PC-PLC in posterior tibial arteries in seven TAO patients and four controls were detected by immunofluorescence staining method. PC-PLC activity increased greatly in serum of TAO patients. Immunofluorescence analysis also revealed an upregulation of PC-PLC in the vascular endothelium of TAO patients. Our data suggest that PC-PLC activity and level increase obviously in TAO patients. Our study may provide new clues for seeking pathogenesis of TAO. Furthermore, it may bring new insights into clinical diagnosis and treatment of TAO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioFactorsSame topicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207