MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083256206 · doi:10.1063/1.1649936

Infrared spectroscopy of acetone–water liquid mixtures. II. Molecular model

2004· article· en· W2083256206 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Joseph Ma×, Camille Chapados

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogen bondMoleculeChemistryCovalent bondBathochromic shiftHydrogenInfrared spectroscopyAqueous solutionHydrogen atomAcetoneAbsorption (acoustics)Absorption bandAbsorption spectroscopyOxygenCrystallographyPhysical chemistryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryGroup (periodic table)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In aqueous acetone solutions, the strong bathochromic shifts observed on the OH and CO stretch infrared (IR) bands are due to hydrogen bonds between these groups. These shifts were evaluated by factor analysis (FA) that separated the band components from which five water and five acetone principal factors were retrieved [J. Chem. Phys. 119, 5632 (2003)]. However, these factors were abstract making them difficult to interpret. To render them real an organization model of molecules is here developed whose abundances are compared to the experimental ones. The model considers that the molecules are randomly organized limited by the hydrogen bond network formed between the water hydrogen atoms and the acetone or water oxygen atoms, indifferently. Because the oxygen of water has two covalent hydrogen atoms which are hydrogen-bonded and may receive up to two hydrogen atoms from neighbor molecules hydrogen-bonded to it, three types of water molecules are found: OH2, OH3, and OH4 (covalent and hydrogen bonds). In the OH stretch region these molecules generate three absorption regimes composed of nu3, nu1, and their satellites. The strength of the H-bond given increases with the number of H-bonds accepted by the oxygen atom of the water H-bond donor, producing nine water situations. Since FA cannot separate those species that evolve concomitantly the nine water situations are regrouped into five factors, the abundance of which compared exactly to that retrieved by FA. From the factors' real spectra the OH stretch absorption are simulated to, respectively, give for the nu3 and nu1 components the mean values for OH2, 3608, 3508; OH3, 3473, 3282 and OH4, 3391, 3223 cm(-1). The mean separations from the gas-phase position which are respectively about 150, 330, and 400 cm(-1) are related to the vacancy of the oxygen electron doublets: two, one, and zero, respectively. No acetone hydrate that sequesters water molecules is formed. Similarly, acetone produces ten species, two of which evolve concomitantly. Spectral similarities further reduce these to five principal IR factors, the abundance of which compared adequately to the experimental results obtained from FA. The band assignment of the five-acetone spectra is given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207