Percutaneous Drainage of Abdominal Abscesses in Pediatric Crohn's Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Crohn's disease is complicated by abscesses in 10-30% of patients during their lifetime. The goal of our study was to illustrate that, besides surgical treatment, percutaneous abscess drainage plays a major role in treating children with Crohn's disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 14 pediatric patients (age range, 12-17 years; median age, 15 years) with proven Crohn's disease. Percutaneous abscess drainage was performed for 15 abdominal or pelvic abscesses or for both abdominal and pelvic abscesses. The abscess was an initial manifestation of Crohn's disease in four patients and complicated well-known disease in 10 patients. Abscesses occurred spontaneously (n = 11), after surgery (n = 3), or after infliximab treatment (n = 1). Their volume ranged from 8 to 442 mL (mean, 113 mL). Fistulas with the bowel were detected in eight cases. RESULTS: Sixteen percutaneous abscess drainages were performed under sonographic or CT guidance (or both) using 6- or 8-French catheters. The procedure was performed with the patient under conscious sedation (n = 14) or anesthesia (n = 2). The duration of the drainage was 1-30 days (mean, 11 days). An enterocutaneous fistula, medically treated with success, was the only complication observed. Complete resolution of the collection was observed in eight abscesses and partial resolution in seven. Resection of the diseased bowel segment with primary anastomosis was possible in 12 patients. In two patients, percutaneous abscess drainage was not followed by surgery. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous abscess drainage is a valuable procedure in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease presenting with pelvic or abdominal abscesses (or both). It improves the general status of the patient and allows a less invasive and easier subsequent surgical procedure. Percutaneous abscess drainage should be performed before definitive treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".