Effect of the pro‐resolution lipid mediator <scp>R</scp>esolvin <scp>E</scp>1 (RvE1) on pulp tissues exposed to the oral environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the effects of topical Resolvin E1 (RvE1) application on infected dental pulps. METHODOLOGY: Forty-two male Wistar rats (n = 6 per three groups/and two time periods) were used. To induce inflammation, pulps in mandibular right first molars were accessed and then left exposed to the oral environment for 24 h. After this period, topical medication with a corticosteroid/antibiotic blend, or RvE1, or its vehicle (Ethanol 0.1%) was directly applied onto the pulp tissue and teeth were restored with silver amalgam. The effects of the protocols were evaluated histologically and compared with control pulps not exposed to the oral environment. The inflammatory changes after 24 and 72 h were assessed through a scoring method and analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's. Differences were considered significant if P < 0.05 (CI = 95%). RESULTS: Ethanol and corticosteroid/antibiotic treatment were not effective in arresting severe inflammatory alterations of exposed pulps at 24 and 72 h (P < 0.05, CI = 95%). At both time periods, RvE1 treatment led to a reduction of tissue cellularity and extent of inflammation, whose changes were not different from control pulps (P > 0.05, CI = 95%). CONCLUSIONS: A protective role for RvE1 in pulp inflammation was observed even in the presence of contamination, suggesting that it may be a candidate for a novel therapeutic strategy for conservative dental pulp treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".