MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083402207 · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.078

Two ancient human genomes reveal Polynesian ancestry among the indigenous Botocudos of Brazil

2014· letter· en· W2083402207 on OpenAlexafffund
Anna‐Sapfo Malaspinas, Óscar Lao, Hannes Schroeder, Morten Rasmussen, Maanasa Raghavan, Ida Moltke, Paula F. Campos, Francisca Santana‐Sagredo, Simon Rasmussen, Vanessa F. Gonçalves, Anders Albrechtsen, Morten E. Allentoft, Philip L. Johnson, Mingkun Li, Silvia Reis, Danilo Vicensotto Bernardo, Michael DeGiorgio, Ana T. Duggan, Murilo Bastos, Yong Wang, Jesper Stenderup, J. Víctor Moreno-Mayar, Søren Brunak, Thomas Sicheritz‐Pontén, Emily Hodges, Gregory J. Hannon, Ludovic Orlando, T. Douglas Price, Jeffrey D. Jensen, Rasmus Nielsen, Jan Heinemeier, Jesper Olsen, Cláudia Rodrigues-Carvalho, Marta Mìrazón Lahr, Walter Alves Neves, Manfred Kayser, Thomas Higham, Mark Stoneking, Sérgio D.J. Pena, Eske Willerslev

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Biology · 2014
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of TorontoNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of General Medical SciencesH. Lundbeck A/SDirectorate for Biological SciencesUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisNational Cancer InstituteCopenhagen Graduate School for Nanoscience and NanotechnologyLundbeckfondenCancer Research UKWellcome TrustDanmarks GrundforskningsfondUniversity of TorontoSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneNational Health and Medical Research CouncilUniversidade de São PauloAarhus UniversitetEuropean CommissionNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchDanmarks Tekniske UniversitetMax-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre AnthropologieNational Research FoundationEmory UniversityMedical Research CouncilVillum FondenUniversity of OxfordUniversity of ChicagoNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiologyIndigenousGenomeEvolutionary biologyGenetic genealogyHuman genomeOut of africaGeneticsGeneEcologyDemographyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCurrent BiologySame topicPacific and Southeast Asian StudiesFrench-language works237,207