MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083403230 · doi:10.1177/0013164406292030

Confidence Intervals for an Effect Size Measure in Multiple Linear Regression

2007· article· en· W2083403230 on OpenAlexaff
James Algina, H. J. Keselman, Randall D. Penfield

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational and Psychological Measurement · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatisticsConfidence intervalCoverage probabilityMathematicsCDF-based nonparametric confidence intervalPercentileLinear regressionRobust confidence intervalsSample size determinationRegression analysisTolerance intervalMeasure (data warehouse)Confidence distributionRegressionComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increase in the squared multiple correlation coefficient (ΔR 2 ) associated with a variable in a regression equation is a commonly used measure of importance in regression analysis. The coverage probability that an asymptotic and percentile bootstrap confidence interval includes Δρ 2 was investigated. As expected, coverage probability for the asymptotic confidence interval was often inadequate (outside the interval .925 to .975 for a 95% confidence interval), even when sample size was quite large (i.e., 200). However, adequate coverage probability for the confidence interval based on a bootstrap interval could typically be obtained with a sample size of 200 or less, and moreover, this accuracy was obtained with relatively small sample sizes (100 or less) with six or fewer predictors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.185
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.698
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1850.698
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0090.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.477
GPT teacher head0.532
Teacher spread0.054 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducational and Psychological MeasurementSame topicAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsFrench-language works237,207