Proteinase-activated receptor-2 activation evokes oesophageal longitudinal smooth muscle contraction via a capsaicin-sensitive and neurokinin-2 receptor-dependent pathway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intraluminal acid evokes sustained oesophageal longitudinal smooth muscle (LSM) contraction and oesophageal shortening, which may play a role in oesophageal pain and the aetiology of hiatus hernia. In the opossum model, this reflex has been shown to involve mast cell activation and release of neurokinins from capsaicin-sensitive neurons. The aim of this study was to determine whether proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) activation evokes reflex LSM contraction via similar mechanisms. METHODS: Tension recording studies were performed using opossum oesophageal LSM strips in the presence and absence of pharmacological agents. In addition, the effect of trypsin on single isolated LSM cells was determined using videomicroscopy, and the expression of PAR-2 in oesophageal tissue was examined using immunohistochemistry. KEY RESULTS: The PAR-2 agonist trypsin evoked sustained, concentration-dependent contraction of LSM muscle strips, but had no effect on isolated LSM cells. The trypsin-induced contraction was blocked by capsaicin desensitization, substance P (SP) desensitization or application of the selective neurokinin-2 (NK-2) receptor antagonist MEN 10376. Immunohistochemistry revealed co-localization of SP, calcitonin gene-related peptide and PAR-2 in axons of opossum oesophageal LSM. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Longitudinal smooth muscle contraction induced by trypsin involves capsaicin-sensitive neurons and subsequent activation of NK-2, which is identical to the pathway involved in acid-induced LSM contraction and oesophageal shortening. This suggests that acid-induced LSM contraction may involve mast cell-derived mediators that activate capsaicin-sensitive neurons via PAR-2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".