Optimal adaptive bandwidth monitoring for qos based retrieval
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network aware multimedia delivery applications are a class of applications that provide certain level of quality of service (QoS) guarantees to end users while not assuming underlying network resource reservations. These applications guarantee QoS parameters like media object transmission time limit by actively monitoring the available bandwidth of the network and adapting the object to a target size that can be transmitted within a given time limit. A critical problem is how to obtain an accurate enough estimation of available bandwidth while not wasting too much time in bandwidth testing. In this paper, we present an algorithm to determine optimal amount of bandwidth testing given a probabilistic confidence level for network-aware multimedia object retrieval applications. The model treats the bandwidth testing as sampling from an actual bandwidth population. It uses statistical estimation method to quantify the benefit of each new bandwidth-testing sample, which is used to determine the optimal amount of bandwidth testing by balancing the benefit with the cost of each sample. Our implementation and experiments shows the algorithm determines the optimal amount of bandwidth testing effectively with minimum computation overhead.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it