Recovery of hindlimb locomotion after incomplete spinal cord injury in the cat involves spontaneous compensatory changes within the spinal locomotor circuitry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI), compensatory changes occur throughout the whole neuraxis, including the spinal cord below the lesion, as suggested by previous experiments using a dual SCI paradigm. Indeed, cats submitted to a lateral spinal hemisection at T10-T11 and trained on a treadmill for 3-14 wk re-expressed bilateral hindlimb locomotion as soon as 24 h after spinalization, a process that normally takes 2-3 wk when a complete spinalization is performed without a prior hemisection. In this study, we wanted to ascertain whether similar effects could occur spontaneously without training between the two SCIs and within a short period of 3 wk in 11 cats. One day after the complete spinalization, 9 of the 11 cats were able to re-express hindlimb locomotion either bilaterally (n = 6) or unilaterally on the side of the previous hemisection (n = 3). In these 9 cats, the hindlimb on the side of the previous hemisection (left hindlimb) performed better than the right side in contrast to that observed during the hemispinal period itself. Cats re-expressing the best bilateral hindlimb locomotion after spinalization had the largest initial hemilesion and the most prominent locomotor deficits after this first SCI. These results provide evidence that 1) marked reorganization of the spinal locomotor circuitry can occur without specific locomotor training and within a short period of 3 wk; 2) the spinal cord can reorganize in a more or less symmetrical way; and 3) the ability to walk after spinalization depends on the degree of deficits and adaptation observed in the hemispinal period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".