Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traumatic lesions involving the occipital condyles and their ligamentous structures are infrequently seen in neurosurgical practice. The clinical spectrum of these injuries is vast and varies from the highly unstable occipitocervical dislocation to relatively insignificant and uncomplicated occipital condyle fractures. These injuries can be very difficult to diagnose on plain films. A high index of suspicion and a low threshold for further definitive imaging is warranted. Significant closed head injuries, lower cranial nerve deficits, brainstem dysfunction, and other cervical spine fractures have been associated with C0 trauma. Thin-section computed tomography (CT) with coronal and sagittal reformatting of the craniocervical junction should be considered as the minimum standard of care in these patients. In patients in which occipital injury is clinically suspected and CT is inconclusive, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indicated. Occipital condyle fractures can generally be treated by external immobilization, whereas occipitocervical dislocations mandate immediate rigid external immobilization followed by early occipitocervical fixation and fusion. KEYWORDS Occipitocervical dislocation - occipital condyle fracture - occipitocervical fusion
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".