MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Determining the Critical Bulking Agent Requirement For Municipal Biosolids Composting

2004· article· en· W2083658394 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCompost Science & Utilization · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicComposting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWoodchipsBiosolidsCompostRaw materialEnvironmental scienceWaste managementPulp and paper industryEnvironmental engineeringChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractAir space within municipal biosolids composting feedstock is an important design and operating consideration. Bulking agents, such as woodchips, are required to ensure adequate air space levels are maintained. The purpose of the study was to report on the use of bench-scale air space tests to identify the critical bulking agent requirement (CBAR). CBAR was defined as the minimum amount of bulking agent required to maintain adequate pore space oxygen levels. Bench-scale air space tests were correlated to full-scale windrow composting performance, particularly pore space oxygen levels. Four volumetric ratios of municipal biosolids and woodchips were tested ranging from 1:1 to 1:4 (biosolids:wood-chips). The traditional soil physics methodology was used to determine total air space (TAS). A new step was added to the method which allowed one to also determine the free air space (FAS) within the sample. In addition, the effect of compaction on TAS and FAS was also investigated. Windrows were monitored for pile temperature and pore space oxygen concentration. At the end of the run, maturity, fecal coliform density, and the presence of salmonella were determined. The heavy metal content of the feedstock material, finished compost, and recycled woodchips were also determined. For the materials tested, biosolids and woodchips, the CBARs, to achieve a FAS of ≥20% and a minimum pore space oxygen content of ≥5%, were estimated as 1:2.5 and 1:2.8 (biosolids:woodchips; vol:vol), respectively. Assuming a target pore space oxygen level of > 5%, the recommended air space value depended on the test method used, and ranged from 26 to 61%. Bench-scale air space values were found to correlate to windrow pore space oxygen levels and operating temperature. A significant thermophilic period was not observed in any of the recipes tested. It was speculated this was caused by the coarse particle size of the woodchips. Based on the observations of the metal contents of the materials used in this investigation, the metal content of recycled material should be considered when evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of using recycled woodchips as a bulking agent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.164
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it