MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083693117 · doi:10.1002/hup.710

Differential effects of chronic lithium and valproate on brain activation in healthy volunteers

2005· article· en· W2083693117 on OpenAlexafffund
Emily C. Bell, Morgan Willson, Alan H. Wilman, Sanjay Dave, Peter H. Silverstone

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsLithium (medication)MedicineNeuroscienceInternal medicinePharmacologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RATIONALE: Previous functional imaging studies have shown altered brain activity during cognitive task performance in bipolar patients. However, the fact that these patients are often on medication makes it unclear to what extent these changes reflect treatment effects. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify regional brain activity changes occurring following lithium and valproate treatment in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, study in which volunteers received either 1000 mg sodium valproate (n = 12), 900 mg lithium (n = 9), or placebo (n = 12). Functional images were acquired using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while subjects performed three cognitive tasks, a word generation paradigm, a spatial attention task and a working memory task. fMRI was carried out both before and after 14 days of treatment with valproate, lithium or placebo. The changes in the magnitude of the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal after treatment were compared between the groups using a one-way ANOVA for each task followed by a post-hoc multiple comparisons correction. RESULTS: A significant group effect was noted in the change in BOLD signal magnitude from baseline to post-treatment, in all three tasks (working memory p< 0.000; spatial attention task p = 0.003; word generation paradigm p = 0.030). In the working memory task, the lithium group had a significant decrease in BOLD signal change, compared with the control group (p< 0.000). A decrease in BOLD signal change was also noted in the valproate group, in the spatial attention task (p = 0.004). Both lithium and valproate groups had a decreased BOLD signal in the verbal task, following treatment, compared with the placebo group (p = 0.061 (lithium approached significance); p = 0.050 (valproate)). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that lithium and valproate have independent effects on brain activation that vary in a task and region-dependent manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Psychopharmacology Clinical and ExperimentalSame topicBipolar Disorder and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207