MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2083730685 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.43.1.263

REDISTRIBUTION OF THE RARE-EARTH ELEMENTS AMONG COEXISTING MINERALS IN METAMAFIC ROCKS ACROSS THE EPIDOTE-OUT ISOGRAD: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE ST. ANTHONY COMPLEX, NORTHERN NEWFOUNDLAND, CANADA

2005· article· en· W2083730685 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Daniel Joseph Mulrooney, Toby Rivers

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpidoteIsogradRedistribution (election)GeologyGeochemistryRare earthMineralogyGeomorphologyPaleontologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrated results of in situ major-element and rare-earth-element analyses of coexisting Ca amphibole, plagioclase, epidote and titanite have been made from a suite of metamafic rocks from the St. Anthony Complex, Newfoundland, across the epidote-out reaction isograd to examine the redistribution of the REE as a consequence of the breakdown of epidote. Important major-element variations include a decrease in X Cum Amp and an increase in X An Pl across the reaction isograd, and an increase in X Czo Ep within the epidote-amphibolite facies. These major-element changes correlate with variations in ∑REE and the LREE:HREE ratio in several of the phases, and also with systematic changes in D *REE partitioning across the epidote-out isograd. Onuma-type diagrams for the partitioning of the REE between coexisting minerals confirm that the REE substitute at single elastic sites in titanite, epidote and plagioclase, whereas in Ca amphibole they occupy two sites, M 4 and M 4′, with the size of the M 4′ peak being positively correlated with X Cum Amp in Ca amphibole. A REE mass balance across the epidote-out isograd yields very good matches between the measured and reconstructed REE abundances in all cases, indicating that metamorphism was essentially isochemical with respect to the rare-earth elements, and that all the hosts for these elements were analyzed. The following major-element mass-balanced reaction, determined by the method of singular value decomposition from mineral compositions in representative samples of epidote amphibolite and plagioclase amphibolite from this ophiolitic complex, provides a realistic representation of the epidote-out isograd in the study area: 2.94 CaAmp1 + 5.00 Pl1 + 1.00 Ep + 5.21Ttn1 = 3.14 CaAmp2+ 5.65 Pl2 + 5.29 Ttn2. Integration of the calculated stoichiometric coefficients of this reaction with the measured REE contents in each phase provides a good match for the MREE and HREE abundances, but a poorer match for the LREE, which show a deficiency on the product side. However, the results are compatible with the measured increases in LREE in Ca amphibole and plagioclase on the product side of the reaction, as a result of the breakdown of epidote and a reduction in LREE abundance in titanite. We highlight the role of epidote and titanite as the principal carriers of the REE in epidote amphibolite, and that of Ca amphibole as the dominant carrier in plagioclase amphibolite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Mineralogist→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→