MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083811630 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.20001

Evaluation of the genes for the adrenergic receptors α2A and α1C and Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome

2003· article· en· W2083811630 on OpenAlexaff
Chun Xu, Fatih Ozbay, Karen Wigg, Rayzie Shulman, Yankı Yazgan, Paul Sandor, Cathy L. Barr

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneticsProbandLinkage disequilibriumCandidate geneGeneBiologyGenetic linkageTourette syndromeChromosomeAdrenergic receptorReceptorHaplotypeMedicineGenotypePsychiatryMutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome (GTS) has long been known to be familial, and evidence from twin studies indicates that it has a substantial genetic component. Our genome scan of sibling pair families with GTS found evidence suggestive of linkage to several chromosomal locations. On the basis of these findings, we have begun to study additional markers in these regions, with some of the markers located in candidate genes. Two candidate genes stand out in these regions: the adrenergic receptor alpha 1C(1A) (ADRA1C) located on chromosome 8p and the adrenergic receptor alpha 2A (ADRA2A) located on chromosome 10q. The adrenergic system has been suggested to play a role in GTS based on the reduction of symptoms with the adrenergic receptor agonists, clonidine and guanfacine. We examined the inheritance of polymorphisms in the ADRA2A and ADRA1C genes in 113 nuclear families identified through a GTS proband. We found no significant evidence for linkage using the transmission disequilibrium test for these two genes. Based on our families, we conclude that these genes are not major genetic factors contributing to the susceptibility to GTS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric GeneticsSame topicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersFrench-language works237,207