Unstable familial transmissions of Huntington disease alleles with 27–35 CAG repeats (intermediate alleles)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are inconsistent reports regarding the likelihood of repeat instability for alleles with 27-35 CAG repeats in the Huntington disease (HD) gene. We have examined the intergenerational stability of such intermediate alleles in 51 families from the University of British Columbia's DNA and Tissue Bank for Huntington Disease Research (UBC-HD Databank). A total of 181 transmissions were identified, with 30% (n = 54/181) of the alleles being unstable upon transmission. The unstable transmissions included both expansions (n = 37) and contractions (n = 17) of CAG size. Of the expanded alleles, 68% (n = 25/37) expanded into the HD range (>36 CAG). Therefore, 14% (n = 25/181) of the 27-35 CAG allele transmissions examined expanded into the disease-associated range resulting in a new mutation for HD. Significantly, of these new mutations, 40% (n = 10/25) originated from an allele with 35 CAG repeats with CAG repeat expansions ranging from +1 CAG to +23 CAG. The proportion of new mutations in the UBC-HD Databank is consistent with the most recent new mutation rate for HD, estimated to be at least 10%. The observed difference in the stability of HD intermediate allele transmissions in this data set and in other studies may be a reflection of a small sample size. Alternately, these inconsistencies may indicate an underlying difference in genetic factors which influence repeat instability between the different populations examined. Additional studies determining the frequency and magnitude of repeat instability in this CAG repeat range and factors that influence instability are urgently needed. Until we understand the clinical implications of HD alleles with 27-35 CAG repeats and establish reliable risks of instability, we should exercise caution when translating these results to the clinic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".