MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083867190 · doi:10.1139/o08-122

Identification of a DNA processing complex from <i>Deinococcus radiodurans</i>

2008· article· en· W2083867190 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Swathi Kota, Hari S. Misra

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPacific Northwest National Laboratory
KeywordsDeinococcus radioduransBiologyDNA repairDNA ligaseBiochemistryDNADNA clampPrimaseDNA damageDNA polymeraseCell biologyMolecular biologyGenePolymerase chain reaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An efficient DNA strand break repair contributes to the radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans, which harbors the DNA repair pathways nearly identical to Escherichia coli. The molecular mechanisms of these proteins functioning in 2 diverse classes of bacteria seem to be different. The macromolecular interactions and formation of multiprotein complexes in vivo have gained significant importance in explaining the mechanism of the complex cellular processes. Here, we report the identification of a novel DNA metabolic protein complex from D. radiodurans. A similar complex has, however, not been found in E. coli. Mass spectrometric analysis showed the presence of a few known DNA repair proteins, molecular chaperones, and a large number of uncharacterized proteins from D. radiodurans R1. Biochemical and immunoblotting results indicated the presence of the protein promoting DNA repair A, DNA polymerase, Mg2+, and (or) Mn2+ -dependent 5'-->3' exonuclease activity along with protein kinase activity and phosphoproteins. DNA ligase activity was completely dependent upon the ATP requirement, as no ligase activity was seen in the presence of NAD as a cofactor. These results suggest the molecular interactions of the known DNA repair proteins with uncharacterized proteins in the macromolecular complex and the regulation of DNA degradation with the involvement of ATP and protein kinase functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207