MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2083910600 · doi:10.1586/14779072.2014.891939

The role of cardiac lipotoxicity in the pathogenesis of diabetic cardiomyopathy

2014· review· en· W2083910600 on OpenAlexaff
John R. Ussher

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipotoxicityMedicineDiabetic cardiomyopathyDyslipidemiaCardiomyopathyInternal medicinePopulationDiabetes mellitusCardiologyType 2 diabetesDiseaseCardiac function curveHeart failureEndocrinologyInsulin resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiomyopathy, the presence of cardiac dysfunction independent of ischemic heart disease and/or hypertension, is becoming a more prominent condition in our diabetic patient population. Unfortunately, we do not yet understand the mechanism(s) responsible for causing diabetic cardiomyopathy. With the recent explosion in the obesity and Type 2 diabetes epidemic, our understanding of dyslipidemia and the adverse effects of lipid surplus on cellular and organ function has grown considerably. Numerous studies now illustrate that excess lipid accumulation may exert direct toxic effects on cellular function, a term coined 'lipotoxicity'. As obesity and Type 2 diabetes are significant risk factors for cardiovascular disease, cardiac lipotoxicity may represent a significant component mediating the diabetic cardiomyopathy phenotype. Therefore, a more complete understanding of how cardiac lipotoxicity is regulated and how different lipid metabolites cause cellular dysfunction may lead to the discovery of novel targets to treat cardiomyopathy in our diabetic patient population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.027
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Cardiovascular TherapySame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207