Comparative analysis of radical‐mediated polyethylene modifications: Vinyltriethoxysilane versus mercaptopropyltriethoxysilane addition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The efficiency and selectivity of two approaches for introducing alkoxysilane functionality to polyethylene (PE) are examined along with the moisture‐curing performance of the resulting products. Although the peroxide‐initiated grafting of vinyltriethoxysilane to PE is accompanied by undesirable crosslinking, comparable silane contents can be introduced without affecting the melt viscosity through the addition of mercaptopropyltriethoxysilane (MPTES) to the unsaturation within the polymer. Rapid hydrogen atom donation by thiols underlies this unique selectivity for grafting versus molecular weight alteration, and gives rise to a remarkable tolerance of MPTES additions to phenolic antioxidants. Direct comparisons of the moisture‐curing efficiencies provided by the two functionalization techniques reveal few significant differences in crosslink yields or composition distributions. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 46:480–485, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".