MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Interpretation of the Magnetic Order, Neutron Diffraction and <sup>111</sup>Cd PAC Studies of NdScGe

2011· article· en· W2083942738 on OpenAlexafffund
J. M. Cadogan, D. H. Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenueDiffusion and defect data, solid state data. Part B, Solid state phenomena/Solid state phenomena · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsNeutron diffractionTetragonal crystal systemQuadrupoleCondensed matter physicsMaterials scienceMagnetic momentFerromagnetismCurie temperatureElectric field gradientMagnetic structureCrystallographyDiffractionNuclear magnetic resonancePhysicsMagnetic fieldCrystal structureAtomic physicsChemistryMagnetizationOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NdScGe is a ferromagnet with TC = 194(2) K. The magnetic moments of the Nd substructure order along the tetragonal c-axis just below TC and undergo a gradual canting away from the c-axis upon cooling, commencing at around 165 K. We used neutron powder diffraction to show that the Nd magnetic moments lie 70(3)o off the c-axis at 4 K [1]. The apparent discrepancy between our neutron diffraction results and those obtained using PAC [2] (a canting angle of around 32o just below TC , increasing to 45o at 25 K) can be reconciled by placing the principal axis of the electric field gradient tensor in the tetragonal basal plane, rather than along the c-axis, as assumed in the PAC analysis. The unusual temperature dependence of the 111Cd PAC quadrupole frequency at the Sc site, which was interpreted in terms of a lattice softening occurring near the Curie temperature, is shown to be a consequence of the fact that one cannot determine the sign of the quadrupole frequency from a PAC experiment. Finally, we show that the Nd magnetic moments in the canted regime have a [110] basal component rather than [100].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiffusion and defect data, solid state data. Part B, Solid state phenomena/Solid state phenomenaSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207