Nutritive value of single-screw extruded and nonextruded triticale distillers dried grains with solubles, with and without an enzyme complex, for broilers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nutritive value of triticale distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) for broilers was investigated in 2 experiments. In experiment 1, four hundred male broilers housed in battery cages were fed diets including 15 or 30% triticale DDGS (extruded or not) or a basal diet, supplemented with or without a multi-enzyme complex from d 21 to 28. Birds were killed and ileal digesta was collected on d 28 to establish the apparent ileal nutrient digestibility (AID) coefficients for both assay diets and DDGS as test ingredients based on 5 cages per diet. In experiment 2, a 42-d performance study compared growth phase-specific diets formulated to similar levels of AME, CP, and digestible lysine with graded levels (0, 5, or 10%) of triticale DDGS inclusion based on a minimum of 4 pens per diet x sex combination. Breast muscle weight and percentage yield were determined on d 37 by sampling 5 birds per pen. In experiment 1, there was a significant (P < 0.05) DDGS level of inclusion x enzyme interaction for CP, lysine, methionine, tryptophan, isoleucine, histidine, and phenylalanine, such that the AID increased with enzyme supplementation based on 15% but not 30% DDGS inclusion. At 15% DDGS inclusion, enzyme supplementation increased the AID of these nutrients in DDGS between 6 and 19 percentage units. Extrusion of triticale DDGS increased (P < 0.05) the AID of GE, CP, methionine, tryptophan, branched-chain amino acids, and phenylalanine between 3 and 8 percentage units. In experiment 2, feeding up to 10% triticale DDGS had no adverse effect on feed intake, weight gain, or feed efficiency of broilers compared with controls over the 42-d study. Feeding up to 10% triticale DDGS did not affect breast weight or yield on d 37. In conclusion, feed enzyme complex supplementation and extrusion both increased the nutritive value of triticale DDGS for broilers. Triticale DDGS can be fed at up to 10% of practical broiler diets without adverse effect on performance and breast muscle yield.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".