Characterization of two families of tandem repeated DNA sequences in<i>Potamogeton pectinatus</i>L.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DNA sequences belonging to two families of tandem repeats, PpeRsa1 (362-364 bp in length, 62% A+T residues) and PpeRsa2 (355-359 bp in length, 59% A+T residues), have been isolated from the Potamogeton pectinatus L. genome. The two sequence families do not share significant nucleotide sequence similarity, even if an evolutionary relationship between them could be assumed. The comparison of the cleaving activity of isoschizomeres that are either sensitive or insensitive to methylation of cytosine residues in the target sequence revealed high methylation in both sequence families. The copy number per 1C DNA of PpeRsa1- and PpeRsa2-related sequences is estimated to be 4.92 x 10(4) and 7.96 x 10(4), respectively. Taken together, these sequences account for about 7.5% of the entire genome of P. pectinatus. The chromosomal organization of these sequences was investigated by fluorescent in situ hybridization. PpeRsa1 and PpeRsa2 repeats found related sequences in 52 chromosomes of the P. pectinatus complement (2n = 78). The related sequences were localized around the centromeres and at the chromosome ends in three pairs of chromosomes, while they were found only at the chromosome ends in the remaining pairs. Twenty-six chromosomes did not show any hybridization signal. The hypothesis that the species is a hybrid between a diploid parent and an allotetraploid parent is put forward.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".