Impaired interhemispheric inhibition in writer's cramp
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Reduced cortical inhibition is a feature of focal hand dystonia and this likely contributes to excessive muscle contractions. Inhibition from the opposite hemisphere, known as interhemispheric inhibition (IHI), was studied bidirectionally in 7 right-handed patients with writer's cramp (WC) and age-matched healthy controls in a cross-sectional physiologic study. METHODS: IHI was measured with paired transcranial magnetic stimulation with the conditioning stimulus applied to the motor cortex and the test stimulus applied to the contralateral motor cortex. Surface EMG was measured in right and left first dorsal interosseous muscles during rest, and while holding a pen between the thumb and index finger at 20% maximum voluntary contraction with the right dystonia-affected hand. The time course and magnitude of IHI was studied at interstimulus intervals of 6, 8, 10, 12, 30, 40, and 50 msec between the conditioning stimulus and test stimulus. RESULTS: In WC at rest, IHI was significantly reduced in the dystonia-affected right hand (IHI from right to left motor cortex) at both short (SIHI, 10-12 msec) and long (LIHI, 30-40 msec) intervals compared to the unaffected hand. Compared to controls, SIHI and LIHI were reduced in the dystonia-affected hand only. There was no difference in IHI between controls and WC during the task of holding a pen. CONCLUSIONS: In WC, both SIHI and LIHI are reduced in the dystonia-affected hand compared to the unaffected hand and to healthy controls. Impaired IHI may contribute to excessive muscle contraction in WC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".