MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084032125 · doi:10.1139/o04-007

Characterization of glycine <i>N</i>-methyltransferase from rabbit liver

2004· article· en· W2084032125 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Doris Kloor, Katrin Karnahl, J. Kömpf

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlycineBiochemistryEnzymeSarcosineAdenosineChemistryMethyltransferaseDeoxyadenosineNucleotideMethylationAmino acidDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The enzymatic properties of glycine N-methyltransferase from rabbit liver and the effects of endogenous adenosine nucleosides, nucleotides and methyltransferase inhibitors were investigated using a photometrical assay to detect sarcosine with o-dianisidine as a dye. After isolation and purification the denatured enzyme showed a two-banded pattern by SDS-PAGE. The enzyme was highly specific for its substrates with a pH-optimum at pH 8.6. Glycine N-methyltransferase exhibits Michaelis-Menten kinetics for its substrates, S-adenosylmethionine and glycine, respectively. The apparent Km and Vmax values were determined for both the substrates, the other substrate being present at saturating concentrations. The enzyme was strongly inhibited in the presence of S-adenosylhomocysteine, 3-deazaadenosine, and 5'-S-isobutylthio-5'-deoxyadenosine. All other inhibitors investigated, adenosine, 2'-deoxyadenosine, aciclovir, and 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine were poor inhibitors of the methylation reaction. Adenine nucleotides and vidarabin were without effect on the enzymatic activity. Based on the kinetic data glycine N-methyltransferase from rabbit liver exhibits appreciable activity at physiological S-adenosylmethionine and S-adenosylhomocysteine levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207