Glycerol addition and conservation of fresh and cryopreserved ram spermatozoa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fresh extended ram semen has a short fertile lifespan whereas acceptable fertility with cryopreserved semen is achieved only by laparoscopy, which limits widespread artificial insemination in sheep. Although glycerol is considered essential for freezing spermatozoa, it is often included in extenders for short-term storage at above-freezing temperatures. To test the hypothesis that glycerol reduces the function of fresh sperm, ram semen was divided into two aliquots and diluted with commercial extenders that were identical, except that one contained 7% glycerol (n = 6). In a second experiment, ram semen was prepared for cryopreservation by a one-step dilution with a 7% glycerol extender or gradually, with a two-step protocol, to test the hypothesis that the method and time of glycerol addition affects sperm quality after freezing and thawing (n = 7). For both experiments, semen was diluted in a synthetic oviductal fluid (SOF-m) and sperm quality was assessed by computer-assisted motility, viability and chlortetracycline fluorescence (CTC) patterns (an indicator of capacitation status). The presence of glycerol did not affect the quality of fresh sperm (P > 0.27). For cryopreserved sperm, the method of glycerol addition also did not affect thawed sperm. However, a decrease in sperm motility and viability, and different distribution of CTC patterns occurred due to the duration of time in extender and in SOF-m (P ≤ 0.0002). Cryo-capacitation was also observed. In conclusion, the presence of glycerol in the extender did not reduce ram sperm quality during conservation of the semen at 5°C or when it was used to completely and rapidly dilute the semen before cooling for cryopreservation. Key words: Sheep, Triladyl, Biladyl, chlortetracycline, artificial insemination, spermatozoa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".