Damages to residential buildings related to pyritic rockfills: field results of an investigation on the south shore of Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerous cases of garage and basement concrete slab distress at various levels of heaving and deterioration were noticed early after construction in the Montreal south-shore area (Canada). The use of clayey sedimentary rock containing pyrite as aggregates for granular subbase is responsible for most of the observed distress. The heaving of the slabs is related to the oxidation process of the pyrite, followed by sulphate crystallization causing the swelling of the compacted granular subbase. A first inspection survey was carried out in the summer of 1999 in an attempt to assess the extent and magnitude of the damage caused by pyritic rockfills. More than 200 houses showing distress associated with pyrite were investigated in three localities. Damage of the garage floor slab seems to occur earlier after construction and to be more severe likely due to the subbase thickness and to the lower quality of the rockfill. Five houses at various stages of reaction process were monitored. The results suggest that the rockfill swelling is quite fast and continuous. The heaving rate of some garage slabs might be as high as 1.2 mm/month.Key words: pyrite, shales, swelling rockfill, oxidation, sulphate attack, damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".