MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2084253895 · doi:10.1118/1.2244651

Po‐Thur Eve General‐24: Non‐Invasive Imaging Phenotypes of Carotid Atherosclerosis in Subjects: MRI, B‐mode and 3D Ultrasound Measurements

2006· article· en· W2084253895 on OpenAlexaff
Micaela Egger, C. Blake, Aarón Vidal, Joseph Kost, J. David Spence, Brian K. Rutt, Aaron Fenster, Andrew A. House, Grace Párraga

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingUltrasoundNuclear medicineRadiologyIntima-media thicknessStroke (engine)CardiologyCarotid arteries

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease, characterized by the accumulation of lipids and fibrous elements within the inner‐most layer of the artery wall. Vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques may eventually rupture, resulting in emboli that can obstruct blood flow and result in stroke or myocardial infarction. Direct measurements of atherosclerosis include non‐invasive imaging phenotypes such as MRI and 3DUS derived plaque and wall volume measurements and B‐mode US measurements of the intima media thickness (IMT). Here we report the first comparison of IMT with 3D Ultrasound and MRI‐derived atherosclerosis phenotypes measured in five subjects with moderate carotid atherosclerosis. Five research subjects with carotid plaque area ⩾ 0.5 cm2 were studied and all subjects were undergoing treatment for hyperlipidemia. Mean age was 66 yrs with no significant difference between males and females. Subjects underwent MRI, 3DUS and 2D B‐mode US of the left and right carotid arteries. A single observer carried out 3DUS vessel wall volume measurements (VWV) in 10 subject images at both time points, a second observer measured MRI vessel wall volume; a third observer measured IMT. Both 3DUS VWV and MRI VWV measurements were repeated five times to determine intra‐observer variability and variability between time points. At baseline 3DUS and MRI VWV measurements were not significantly different. No significant differences was observed for mean 3DUS VWV and MRI VWV at test and retest. No significant difference between mean IMT at test and retest was found. IMT measurements had the highest intra‐class correlation coefficients and the lowest coefficient of variation values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→