MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084279721 · doi:10.1021/ac001001c

Two-Dimensional Direct-Reading Fluorescence Spectrograph for DNA Sequencing by Capillary Array Electrophoresis

2001· article· en· W2084279721 on OpenAlexaff
Jianzhong Zhang, Xiaoling Puyang, Yu Fang, Lillian M. Cook, Norman J. Dovic̀hi

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCuvetteChemistryCapillary actionCapillary electrophoresisSpectrographOpticsPrismLaser-induced fluorescenceFluorescenceAnalyteAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a compact, two-dimensional direct-reading fluorescence spectrograph and demonstrate its application to DNA sequencing by capillary array electrophoresis. The detection cuvette is based on sheath flow, wherein the capillaries terminate in a two-dimensional array in a fluid-filled chamber that is pressurized with buffer. A thin metal plate is located downstream from the capillaries. This barrier plate has an array of holes that precisely matches the location of the capillaries. Buffer flows through the holes, drawing analyte from the capillaries in a well-defined array of thin filaments. Fluorescence is excited in the upper chamber with an elliptically shaped laser beam. The bottom chamber is sealed with a glass window and drained from the side. Fluorescence is detected by imaging the illuminated sample streams through the holes in the barrier plate. A prism is used to disperse fluorescence from each sample across a CCD camera so that the emission spectrum is monitored simultaneously from each capillary. The instrument is demonstrated in a 32-capillary configuration but can be scaled to several thousand capillaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207