MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084282121 · doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2013.07.009

Structural elucidation of full-length nidogen and the laminin–nidogen complex in solution

2013· article· en· W2084282121 on OpenAlexafffund
Trushar R. Patel, Claudia Bernards, Markus Meier, Kevin McEleney, Donald J. Winzor, Manuel Koch, Jörg Stetefeld

Bibliographic record

VenueMatrix Biology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftManitoba Health Research Council
KeywordsLamininSmall-angle X-ray scatteringFibronectinBasement membraneExtracellular matrixPerlecanBiophysicsIntegrinChemistryCrystallographyScatteringMaterials scienceBiochemistryCell biologyBiologyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nidogen-1 is a key basement membrane protein that is required for many biological activities. It is one of the central elements in organizing basal laminae including those in the skin, muscle, and the nervous system. The self-assembling extracellular matrix that also incorporates fibulins, fibronectin and integrins is clamped together by networks formed between nidogen, perlecan, laminin and collagen IV. To date, the full-length version of nidogen-1 has not been studied in detail in terms of its solution conformation and shape because of its susceptibility to proteolysis. In the current study, we have expressed and purified full-length nidogen-1 and have investigated its solution behavior using size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), dynamic light scattering (DLS) and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). The ab initio shape reconstruction of the complex between nidogen-1 and the laminin γ-1 short arm confirms that the interaction is mediated solely by the C-terminal domains: the rest of the domains of both proteins do not participate in complex formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMatrix BiologySame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207