MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Separate Proteolipid Protein/DM20 Enhancers Serve Different Lineages and Stages of Development

2008· article· en· W2084302392 on OpenAlexafffund
M. C. Tuason, A. Rastikerdar, Tanja Kuhlmann, C. Goujet-Zalc, Bernard Zalc, Sérgio Atala Dib, Hana Friedman, AC Peterson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
Topicinterferon and immune responses
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityRoyal Victoria Hospital
FundersInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleGenome Canada
KeywordsBiologyProteolipid protein 1EnhancerGene isoformGeneticsMyelin proteolipid proteinGeneLocus (genetics)TransgeneOligodendrocytePhenotypeMyelinCell biologyGene expressionMyelin basic proteinCentral nervous systemNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The gene encoding DM20 emerged in cartilaginous fish, descending from a bilaterian ancestor of the M6 proteolipid gene family. Its proteolipid protein (PLP) isoform appeared in amphibians, contains an additional 35 amino acids, and, in the mammalian CNS, is the dominant myelin protein in which it confers an essential neuroprotective function. During development, the DM20 isoform is prominent in a number of tissues, and plp/DM20 transcripts are detected in multiple progenitor populations, including those that continue to express plp/DM20 as they differentiate into myelinating oligodendrocytes. The locus also encodes isoforms with extended leader sequences that accumulate in the cell bodies of several types of neurons. Here, to locate and characterize regulatory sequences controlling the complex plp/DM20 transcription program, putative regulatory sequences, suggested by interspecies conservation, were ligated individually to a minimally promoted eGFPlacZ reporter gene. These constructs were inserted in single copy at a common site adjacent to the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase locus in embryonic stem cells and their in vivo expression programs were compared in transgenic mice. Most expressed developmental and cell-specific subprograms accommodated within the known expression phenotype of the endogenous plp/DM20 locus, thus defining multiple components of the combinatorial mechanism controlling its normal temporal and cell-specific program. Along with previously characterized nervous system enhancers, those described here should help expose the content and configuration of elements that are operational in multiple glial and neuronal lineages. The transgenic lines derived here also provide effective markers for multiple stages of glial and neuronal lineage progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicinterferon and immune responsesFrench-language works237,207