Polymorphism of the major surface epitope of the CopB outer membrane protein of<i>Moraxella catarrhalis</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The CopB outer membrane protein has been considered a vaccine candidate for the prevention of infections due to Moraxella catarrhalis. Monoclonal antibody 10F3 recognizes whole cells of about 70% of clinical isolates, suggesting that this epitope is reasonably conserved. To determine whether CopB has other surface epitopes, we analyzed M. catarrhalis isolates using polyclonal sera against recombinant CopB proteins from a 10F3 positive isolate and a 10F3 negative isolate, and polyclonal sera against synthetic peptides that contained the sequence corresponding to the 10F3 epitope region of three different isolates. Extensive cross-reactivity was observed with the anti-CopB sera towards purified recombinant CopB proteins in Western blot and antigen ELISA, implying that antigenic regions common to both proteins were present. However, anti-CopB sera resembled anti-CopB peptide sera in exhibiting similar binding specificity to whole cells, segregating M. catarrhalis isolates into four CopB groups. We subsequently cloned and sequenced the copB genes from representative isolates. The deduced CopB amino acid sequences and the degree of sequence identity also demonstrated the existence of the same four CopB groups. Each of the four groups had a unique sequence in the 10F3 epitope region and a fifth group had the epitope deleted. The polymorphism of the major surface epitope prompts further consideration regarding the utility of CopB as a vaccine component as well as the design of an efficacious CopB-based vaccine to achieve broad protection against Moraxella infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".