MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2084414854 · doi:10.1117/12.628486

Strategies for developing tunable multiwavelength mode-locked semiconductor fiber ring lasers

2005· article· en· W2084414854 on OpenAlexafffund
Lawrence R. Chen, Hong Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOpticsOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceOptical amplifierFiber Bragg gratingZero-dispersion wavelengthSemiconductor laser theoryFiber laserWavelengthLaserOptical fiberDispersion-shifted fiberFiber optic sensorSemiconductorPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compact optical sources that generate picosecond pulses at multiple wavelengths are of interest for numerous applications in optical instrumentation, fiber optic sensing, and optical communications. In recent years, numerous methods have been demonstrated to obtain multi-wavelength, mode-locked (ML) operation from erbium-doped fiber lasers (EDFLs) and semiconductor fiber ring lasers (SFRLs). In contrast to EDFLs, the use of semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOAs) allows for stable, multi-wavelength emission at room temperature with narrow wavelength separation since they are not constrained by the EDF homogenous broadened linewidth, and for operation over a wide wavelength band. To increase the functionality for some applications, it is also important to be able to tune the output wavelengths of the optical pulse source. In this paper, we provide an overview of our on-going work on developing tunable multi-wavelength, ML-SFRLs. In terms of achieving multi-wavelength operation, we have used multi-wavelength filters based on a high-birefringence Sagnac loop and superimposed fiber Bragg gratings. In terms of short pulse generation, we have explored two different methods for mode-locking: the use of an intra-cavity electro-optic modulator and the injection of an external optical control signal to modulate the gain of the SOA via cross-gain modulation. Finally, in terms of wavelength tunable operation, we have exploited dispersion tuning, i.e. the use of a dispersive cavity and changing the modulation frequency of the mode-locking element. We present and discuss our results for two different ML-SFRL configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207